|
The
Slaughterhouse Informer
A
Compendiium of Various Official Lies, Business Scandals, Small
Murders, Frauds, and Other Gross Defects of Our Current Political,
Business and Religious Moral Lepers.
Presenting a new magazine that contains material that is not found
elsewhere and is very difficult to post on the Internet. The
‘Voice of the White House’ will appear in each issue containing
material not found on TBR News for very obvious reasons.This
publication will appear once a week, on Wednesday, every week, will
be ten pages in length and is available by subscription only. The
price is $5.00 a month and can be paid via PayPal or by check, sent
to ‘Morris Productions, 1350 E. New Yort St. Ste A2-190, Aurora,
Il 60504.’ If you don’t like it, and Bush supporters can read
the Drudge Report for free, you can cancel at any time.
The Voice of the White House
Washington, D.C.,
October 2, 2007: “There is a very serious aspect to the current
economic collapse that no one wants to discuss, neither the economic
pundits, the media or the scared politicians. This concerns an
aspect of the subprime scams and, basically and stripped of
euphemistic words and propaganda phrases, is that very large amounts
of money from various banks and financial institutions and the
owners and controllers thereof were, and are being, sent outside
this country to a secure area. I am speaking most specifically of
American business frantically sending, electronically, huge amounts
of money to banks in Israel. The three banks that are getting most
of the stolen money are: Hapoalim
group, Bank
Leumi group, Discount
Bank group. It is not necessary to mention that the senders are
all Jewish and it should be noted that Israeli banking concerns
practice strict banking security (see their Protection of Privacy
Law, 1981 [PPL]) Under
the PPL, “an infringement of privacy is, inter alia, a violation
of an obligation to maintain secrecy regarding a person’s private
affairs, established by explicit or implicit agreement.” The
bank’s obligation of secrecy extends not only to the details of
the client’s account but also to all transactions related to the
account In other words, if the US authorities want to know about
this, they can bend over while the Israeli bankers drive them home.
And if the sticky-fingered ones decide to make a quick flight to
Israel ahead of FBI investigators, like their new accounts, they are
entirely safe. Note here that Israel
does not extradite its citizens. But it does allow prosecutions in
its own courts for crimes committed abroad. None of this information
is really secret but is well-known to investigative bodies such as
the Department of State and the FBI. Currently,U.S. law-enforcement
personnel and prosecutors, who fear that Israeli-oriented economic
criminals will use the Jewish state as a refuge.
Lehman
Brothers Shipped Off $400B Just Before Bankruptcy… Nice !
September 27, 2008
by Linda Sandler
Bloomberg
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s brokerage unit, in the months
before its parent filed for bankruptcy protection, lost more than
$400 billion in assets, according to the trustee overseeing customer
accounts.
Lehman's holding company filed for bankruptcy Sept. 15
claiming $639 billion in assets, using four-month-old data. The
wholly owned brokerage unit shrank to less than $100 billion in
assets from $500 billion ``a few months ago,'' according to a Sept.
19 court statement by James Giddens, the trustee overseeing the
settling of Lehman brokerage customer accounts by the Securities
Investor Protection Corp.
The loss in value was caused by ``changes in the market,''
according to Giddens, a partner at law firm Hughes Hubbard &
Reed, who spoke at a bankruptcy court hearing in Manhattan. The
runoff may indicate Lehman's customers, including many hedge funds,
canceled and closed out trades as they began to doubt the firm's
ability to navigate the credit crunch, bankruptcy analysts and
lawyers said.
``There was the proverbial run on the bank'' at Lehman, said
Martin Bienenstock of the law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf, who is
advising clients including Walt Disney Co. on recovering their money
from Lehman. There was a similar capital flight from Bear Stearns
earlier this year, he said.
Most of Lehman's pre-bankruptcy assets were securities,
according to its balance sheets. Lehman said on Sept. 10 that the
consolidated gross assets of the firm stood at $600 billion and net
assets at $311 billion. The difference between net and gross is the
so-called matched book, which is overnight lending or securities
pledged for overnight borrowing.
The
Iranian Mystery Ship: Death from the Sea
October
3, 2008
by
Brian Harring
www.brianharring@yahoo.com
The
MV Iran Deyanat. Photo from Maritime News Russia.
On
August 21st, 2008, the MV Iran Deyant, 44,458 dead
weight bulk carrier was heading towards the Suez Canal. As it was
passing the Horn of Africa, about 80 miles southeast of al-Makalla
in Yemen, the ship was surrounded by speedboats filled with members
of a gang of Somalia pirates who grab suitable commercial ships and
hold them,, and their cargos and crews for ransom. The
captain was defenseless against the 40 pirates armed with AK-47s and
rocket-propelled grenades blocking his passage. He had little choice
other than to turn his ship over to them. What the pirates were not
banking on, however, was that this was no ordinary ship.
The
MV Iran Deyanat is owned and operated by the Islamic Republic
of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) - a state-owned company
run by the Iranian military that was sanctioned by the U.S.
Department of the Treasury on September 10, shortly after the ship's
hijacking. According
to the U.S. Government, the company regularly falsifies
shipping documents in order to hide the identity of end users, uses
generic terms to describe shipments to avoid the attention of
shipping authorities, and employs the use of cover entities to
circumvent United Nations sanctions to facilitate weapons
proliferation for the Iranian Ministry of Defense.
The MV Iran Deyanat departed
Nanjing, China, July 28,
and, according to its manifest, planned to sail to Rotterdam,
where it would offload 42,500 tons of iron ore and "industrial
products" purchased by an unidentified “ German client”.
The ship has a crew of 29 men, including a Pakistani captain, an
Iranian engineer, 13 other Iranians, 3
Indians, 2 Filipinos, and 10 Eastern Europeans, stated to be
Albanians
Somali
pirates in action
The
MV Iran Deyanat was brought to Eyl, a sleepy fishing village
in northeastern Somalia, and was secured by a larger gang of pirates
- 50 onboard and 50 onshore. The
Somali pirates attempted to inspect the ship's seven cargo
containers but the containers were locked. The crew claimed that
they did not have the "access codes" and could not open
them. Pirates
have stated they were unable to open the hold without causing
extensive damage to the ship, and threatened to blow it up The
Iranian ship’s captain
and the engineer were contactd by cell phone and demanded to
disclose the actual nature of the mysterious “powdered cargo”
but the captain and his officers were very evasive. Initially they
said that the cargo contained "crude oil" but then claimed
it contained "minerals." Following this initial rebuff,
the pirates broke open one of the containers and discovered it to be
filled with packets of what
they said was “a powdery fine sandy soil”
Within a period
of three days, those pirates who had boarded the ship and opened the
cargo container with its gritty sand-like contents, all developed
strange health complications, to include serious skin burns and loss
of hair. And within two weeks, sixteen of the pirates subsequently
died, either on the ship or on shore
.News about the illness and the toxic cargo quickly reached
Garowe, seat of the government for the autonomous region of Puntland.
Angered over the wave of piracy and suspicious about the Iranian
ship, authorities dispatched a delegation led by Minister of
Minerals and Oil Hassan Allore Osman to investigate the situation on
September 4. and they witnessed some of the deaths due to exposure
to ‘something
on that ship.’
The Somali pirates initially set the ship's ransom at $2
million and the Iranian government provided $200,000 to a local
broker "to facilitate the exchange."
The $2 million dollar ransom agreement, which was supposedly secured
on September 6th, never took place for reasons unknown. After
September 10th, sanctions on
IRISL were applied specifically because the company was said to
engaged in illicit operations on behalf of the Iranian Revolutionary
Guard Corps.
Serious negotiations
were broken off completely.
Iranian authorities subsequently denied that it agreed to the price
nor had paid any money to the pirates. Nevertheless, after sanctions
were applied to IRISL on September 10, Osman says, the Iranians told
the pirates that the deal was off. "They told the pirates that
they could not come because of the presence of the U.S. Navy."
The region is patrolled
by the multinational Combined Taskforce 150, which
includes ships from the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet.
Subsequently, it was disclosed that the U.S. government had
offered to pay $7
million to the pirates to "receive entry permission and search
the vessel." Officials in the Pentagon and the Department of
State have consistently refused to comment on the situation.
The
exact nature of the cargo remains officially a mystery but officials
in Puntland and Baidoa are convinced the ship was carrying weapons
to Eritrea for Islamist insurgents. "We cannot inspect the
cargo yet," Osman said, "but we are sure that it is
weapons."
The US Navy (and the French and the Russians) have been hove
to off the coast of Eyl, going anywhere once released, it will be
seized once it gets to sea. The specific clauses that have been
approved in both the UN and in Congress would allow the US Navy to
seize the ship under the suspicion clause. The claims that there are
weapons onboard, and the possibility there might be chemical
weapons, has insured there is at the very minimum, an inspection of
the ship by outside authority will be mandated. At this writing, the
MV Iran Deyanat is at anchor, watched closely by
American, French and Russian naval units.
Although American intelligence and government sources are
maintaining a strictly observed silence, the same does not apply to
the Russians and so it is that we learn the real story of the MV
Iran Deyanat. She was an enormous floating dirty bomb, intended
to detonate after exiting the Suez Canal at the eastern end of the
Mediterranean and in proximity to the coastal cities of Israel. The
entire cargo of radioactive sand, obtained by Iran from China (the
latter buys desperately needed oil from the former) and sealed in
containers which, when the charges on the ship are set off after the
crew took to the boats, will be blasted high into the air where
prevailing winds will push the highly dangerous and radioactive
cloud ashore.
Given the large number of deaths from the questing Somali
pirates, it should be obvious that when the contents of the ship’s
locked cargo containers finally descended onto the land, the death
toll would be enormous. This ship was nothing more nor less than the
long-anticipated Iranian attack on Israel. Not the expected rocket
attacks (which could be interdicted by the Israelis) but even more
deadly and unexpected attack by sea.. It is very interesting to note
that the Israeli government has in the past few weeks, been loudly
demanding that the United States establish a naval blockade of Iran.
The reason for this blockade would be to prevent any more
Iranian ships with deadly cargos from attacking either Israel or
other targets from the sea.
See also: ‘Pirates Die Strangely After Hijacking Iranian
Ship’ by Andrew Donaldson September 28, 2008,
The Times of London
The Collapse of America’s
Banking and Credit
Credit
hangover, big headache for American Express
October
2, 2008
by
Juan Lagorio
Reuters
NEW
YORK (Reuters) - American Express Co (AXP.N: Quote,
Profile,
Research,
Stock
Buzz), which launched its charge card business 50 years
ago today, may wish it was back in those good old days.
The
fourth-largest U.S. card issuer expanded aggressively in recent
years beyond charge cards paid off once a month into revolving
credit cards, a strategy that could be backfiring.
"You're
feeling the effects of lending too much in a time when they should
have been pulling back, which is 2006 and 2007," said John
Williams, an analyst of Macquarie Research.
Higher
delinquency rates, bigger loan losses provisions and more expensive
funding costs are now widely expected to hit American Express harder
than its peers at least until the end of 2009.
Often
seen as catering to relatively wealthy customers and companies, the
firm has been expanding into credit cards faster than rivals such as
Discover Financial Services (DFS.N: Quote, Profile,
Research,
Stock
Buzz), Capital One Financial Corp (COF.N: Quote, Profile,
Research,
Stock
Buzz), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N: Quote, Profile,
Research,
Stock
Buzz) and Citigroup Inc (C.N: Quote,
Profile,
Research,
Stock
Buzz) by reaching a wider range of clients.
Investors
are already punishing American Express in the stock market. The
credit card company, part of the Dow Jones industrial average, lost
a third of its market value in 2008, while Discover's shares fell 10
percent and Capital One stock was up 4 percent.
The
company's U.S. card lending portfolio grew 17 percent and 23
percent, respectively, over the last two years, 11 points and 14
points faster than the industry, Credit Suisse analyst Moshe
Orenbuch said in a research note.
Furthermore,
American Express has grown more in states -- such as California and
Florida -- that have been hardest hit by the housing downturn.
After
defaulting on their home loans, some consumers are now expected to
do the same with their credit cards, in particular given growing
unemployment and a broad deterioration in the U.S. economy, which
could hit consumer spending in 2009.
American
Express U.S. net charge-offs -- a measure of cardholder defaults --
jumped to 5.3 percent in the second quarter of 2008 from 4.3 percent
in the first quarter and 2.9 percent a year earlier.
Analysts
estimate net charge-offs rates could increase to close to 7 percent
by the end of next year. The rate of increase would be two or three
times higher than its rivals, according to Credit Suisse.
FUNDING
COSTS, RESERVES THREAT
American
Express is more dependent on short-term capital markets to fulfill
its funding needs than some of its bigger rivals with huge deposits.
Although
the firm has already been able to raise 85 percent of its funding
needs for 2008 -- which total $27 billion -- investors said the
current credit squeeze would significantly increase its funding
costs.
"They're
paying more for money and they're not being able to pass that
through to their cardholders, and that's a squeeze for them,"
said Walter Todd, portfolio manager of Greenwood Capital Associates.
The
company has a further $20 billion in debt expiring in 2009.
"The
interest rates on their short-term borrowing have gone up
significantly in the last few months and even in the last two weeks,
which could present a problem for them," Williams said.
"It could drive their interest expense higher and it could be
another crimp on their profitability."
Like
other credit card companies, American Express is selectively scaling
back some U.S. customers' credit lines and reducing efforts to gain
new customers domestically. It is also cutting advertising and
promotion expenses.
In
the second-quarter, American Express set aside $1.889 billion to
cover losses, nearly double the $977 million it set aside the same
quarter last year.
Credit
Suisse's Orenbuch said American Express reserved for about 60
percent of prospective loan losses at the end of the second quarter,
below the 80 percent rate for Capital One and Discover, a sign it
has less margin for error going forward.
Orenbuch,
who recently cut his earnings estimates for American Express,
expects American Express to boost reserves by a further $800 million
in 2009.
CHALLENGING
ECONOMY
American
Express is expected to suffer more as the U.S. housing collapse hits
consumer spending.
U.S.
consumer confidence has weakened as food and fuel prices have risen
and job losses have mounted. U.S. unemployment hit a five-year high
of 6.1 percent in August.
The
outlook for the U.S. economy has deteriorated even further as the
financial crisis forced the U.S. government to craft a $700 billion
financial industry bailout plan.
In
July, American Express shocked some investors when it posted a
lower-than-expected net income, abandoned its earnings outlook and
increased its loan losses provisions.
But
investors and analysts said there could be more surprises to come.
American Express's earnings per share are expected to rise 8 percent
to $2.93, according to Reuters Estimates, but many believe those
figures are too rosy.
(Editing
by Andre Grenon)
China
Could Be Dragged Down by Wall Street Crash
October
3, 2008
by William Pesek
Bloomberg
Few
questions confound economists more: What might tip China into the
meltdown that so many have feared for so many years?
Possibilities include overheating, social instability,
corruption, pollution, debt crises, war over Taiwan and a post-
Olympics growth swoon. It's a perfectly rational expectation. No
rapidly industrializing nation has ever avoided some kind of crisis,
least of all upstarts in Asia.
The list rarely, if ever, included a Wall Street crash. And
yet, financial troubles in the U.S. may be the catalyst that
devastates the world's fourth-biggest economy.
This will sound like a reach to those viewing Asia's
strengths. China, for example, is enjoying 10 percent growth as U.S.
lawmakers argue over rescuing markets and averting a depression.
With its $1.8 trillion of reserves, China could bail out the U.S.
without batting an eye.
Japan is returning to acquisition mode after its banks
avoided the toxic debt devastating U.S. peers. Mitsubishi UFJ
Financial Group Inc.'s $9 billion investment in Morgan Stanley this
week is a case in point. After years of lecturing Japan about its
shaky banks, the U.S. is coming hat-in-hand to Tokyo.
Yet China's chances of avoiding the U.S. crisis are dwindling
by the day.
``U.S. consumers are tapped out and they're going to stop
buying Chinese exports, says Simon Grose-Hodge, a strategist at
LGT Group in Singapore. ``There's no way China's domestic demand can
take up that slack.
Recession Risks
Adds Michael Pettis, a finance professor at Peking University
in Beijing: ``We should all hope the recession associated with the
U.S. financial crisis is very, very mild.''
The odds of a mild U.S. slowdown are declining almost as fast
as stock prices. Even with hundreds of billions of dollars worth of
Wall Street bailouts, consumption decreases and big job cuts will
probably intensify.
The slow drip, drip, drip nature of Wall Street's swoon
should concern officials in Beijing. China's mercantilist model
makes the most populous nation dangerously dependent on consumers in
the biggest economy. Growth in Asia will experience quite a setback
if the U.S. enters a prolonged period of weakness.
While a Japan-like ``lost decade'' isn't the best-case
scenario, Americans aren't sitting on the kind of savings that
Asians are. As U.S. growth slows, debt is reduced and households
increase savings, exporters such as Hong Kong, South Korea and
Thailand must look elsewhere for demand.
Little Help
Europe and Japan may be of little help. Japan is on the verge
of a recession, while Europe is becoming increasingly vulnerable to
events in the U.S. China will be hurt by all of the above, ridding
Asia of a key source of stability.
Many say China's slowing from 10 percent growth to 8 percent
isn't a disaster. Yet if a government relies on rising prosperity to
conceal domestic challenges —
including the widening gap between rich and poor —
slowing growth is a major problem.
Nothing less than a drastic rebalancing will be required:
More domestic consumption, a strengthening currency and greater
investment in health care, pensions and education. Pulling that off
quickly and with minimal disruption would be a feat like no other in
economic history.
Anyone who believes China is set for smooth sailing as the
U.S. sinks is likely to be as wrong as those arguing a year ago that
the subprime-loan crisis was containable.
Asia Decoupling
One of the key points here is the importance of Asia
decoupling itself from the U.S. once and for all. It's easier said
than done.
It's often pointed out that Asia is holding the cards. Were
China to dump its $519 billion of Treasuries, the U.S. would be in
for a shock. So would China, as the fallout in the U.S. would drag
on China's all-important export industries.
Stocks, too. Many Chinese are recession virgins —
they are far more used to booming than slowing growth. Equity
investors are far more accustomed to double-digit gains than big
drops in shares. It's an open question how this year's 58 percent
plunge in Chinese shares affects sentiment.
There is reason to think Asia can stand its ground. The
region's improvements since the 1997 crisis left banks stable,
markets humming and currency reserves at comfortable levels. Turmoil
in the U.S. is encouraging Asia to take steps to become more
independent from bigger economies.
Nations such as China are succeeding by ignoring advice from
officials in Washington. After years of being lectured to bolster
its banks, China is watching as the financial system the U.S.
espoused as optimal crumbles.
The reluctance of Asian banks to buy hard-to-value securities
such as collateralized debt obligations left them in ``rock solid''
financial shape, says Marc Faber, managing director of Marc Faber
Ltd. in Hong Kong. Also, central banks have been taking steps to
boost investor and consumer confidence.
If things get shakier, though, Asia could be dragged down
with the U.S. economy. Amid unprecedented upheaval, it almost seems
fitting that a risk few considered a year ago could be the one to
undermine China.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_pesek&sid=aglZNvpnT6KU
Letters to the Editor
From:
XXXXXXX
To:
walter storch (tbrnews@hotmail.com)
| Sent:
Wed 10/01/08 9:47 AM
|
Question:
Why does Congress shut down for a Jewish religious holiday? Is
nobody screaming about the separation between Church and State for
this one.
Just curious.
Response:
It is very difficult to answer this without sounding like a
stereotypical anti-Semite but the fact is that at the present time,
Jews basically control the United States.
Their bankers have led the rest of us into chaos, chaos from
which they all drew healthy profits (which they now bank in safety
in Israeli banks), the so-called Neo-cons, all of whom are
right-wing Zionists, have pushed this country into the Iraq wars and
now are yammering their demands for us to attack their main enemy,
Iran.
They occupy most of the middle to upper command levels of the
CIA and it is well-known in the foreign intelligence communities
that anything they can lay their hands on in the way of secret
information goes at once to Tel Aviv. It also goes to Moscow because
the SVR has "plants" in Israeli intelligence.
The Russians don't have to infiltrate our intelligence
services as they did during the complaisant Roosevelt administration
because they get the information, a la Pollard, straight from
Israel.
The pending Georgian attack on South Ossetia last August, an
attack well-known in advance to Washington, was almost at once
betrayed to Russia by an Israeli officer stationed in that country.
No, here is the
answer to your question and if you wonder if I would dare publish
this exchange, rest assured that I will.
You might well ask, 'What is to be done?' and the answer is
very obvious.
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 05:02:03 -0700
From: baylesy@yahoo.com
Subject: Gold question
To: tbrnews@hotmail.com
Dear Brian,
I just read your latest
edition of TBR News (I'm a big fan), and more specifically, the
article on gold. Coincidentally, I invest with Peter Schiff's firm,
Euro Pacific. I have a question; is investing in SPDR GOLD SHARES (GLD)
just as safe as buying and holding actual gold coins? I'm reluctant
to buy real gold because if the price does skyrocket and I want to
cash in on some of the profit, I wouldn't know where to sell. I have
heard that the gold coin business can be very shady and wouldn't
think that a local gold exchange would buy back coins at the retail
value. I know that you're not an investment guru, but I have
followed your blogs on things such as investing in art, and you do
seem to be ahead of the curve on these types of issues so I thought
that it wouldn't hurt to ask you about this. Thank-you.
Cheers,
Eric
Response:
Dear Eric:
I do not profess
to be an expert in anything, unlike the bloggers who know everything
and do not hesitate to tell the world about their utter perfection.
I have some comments on gold because I do know about the
buying and selling of it.
The so-called "spot price" is a snare and a
delusion. "Spot price" is the commodity price, not the
actual value of gold. The commodity market is a gambler's den. The
market sets the price of gold, not speculators in London or New
York.
Gold coins are very hard to get now and our mint has stopped
producing them. Do not ever, ever trust the
scammers who want you to buy their gold from them which they will
keep, safe, in their secret vaults.
This is like the hedge funds scams.
If you want to cash out, you can't because there ain't no
gold, baby, and no "secret vaults."
I suggest you go to a local coin store and buy gold from
them. Not numismatic American gold but the standard old British,
French or Swiss bullion gold coins. Then put them in a safe place
and watch their value grow.
I also suggest silver coins but stay away from any
"Morgan" silver dollar because all of these, and some
American gold, is being faked in China (the silver content is less
and they weigh less in consequence) and beware of the glossy coin
magazines that offer "24-caret gold clad" Tongan Pandas.
Krugerrands, Maple Leafs and the older European coins are
your best and safest investment and you can generally buy these
coins in any coin store.
Beware of the glossy coin emporiums who add all kinds of
"premium" charges to their sales. The local people are
generally best. They pay 96% of spot and sell for 2-4% over spot.
Hope this has
been of some assistance to you....
Brian
Conversations
with the Crow: Part 34
Editor’s
note: When we ran the first conversation
in this series, there was the question of reader interest and
acceptability. It is pleasant to report that our server was jammed
with viewers and the only other tbrnews story that has had more
viewers was our Forward Base Falcon story that had a half a million
viewers in less that two days. We are now going to reprint all
of the Crowley conversations, including a very interesting
one on John McCain, in
chronological sequence. It is also pleasant to note that two
publishers and three reporters have all expressed concrete interest
in the Crowley conversations. It is even more pleasurable to note
that a number of people inside the Beltway and in McLean, Virginia,
have been screaming with rage!
On October 8th, 2000, Robert Trumbull Crowley, once a leader
of the CIA's Clandestine Operations Division, died in a Washington
hospital of heart failure and the end effects of Alzheimer's
Disease. Before the late Assistant Director Crowley was cold, Joseph
Trento, a writer of light-weight books on the CIA, descended on
Crowley's widow at her town house on Cathedral Hill Drive in
Washington and hauled away over fifty boxes of Crowley's CIA files.
Once Trento had his new find secure in his house in Front
Royal , Virginia, he called a well-known Washington fix lawyer with
the news of his success in securing what the CIA had always
considered to be a potential major embarrassment. Three months
before, July 20th of that year, retired Marine Corps colonel William
R. Corson, and an associate of Crowley, died of emphysema and lung
cancer at a hospital in Bethesda, Md.
After Corson's death, Trento and a well-known Washington
fix-lawyer went to Corson's bank, got into his safe deposit box and
removed a manuscript entitled 'Zipper.' This manuscript, which dealt
with Crowley's involvement in the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy, vanished into a CIA burn-bag and the matter was considered
to be closed forever.
The small group
of CIA officials gathered at Trento's house to search through the
Crowley papers, looking for documents that must not become public. A
few were found but, to their consternation, a significant number of
files Crowley was known to have had in his possession had simply
vanished.
When published material concerning the CIA's actions against
Kennedy became public in 2002, it was discovered to the CIA's
horror, that the missing documents had been sent by an increasingly
erratic Crowley to another person and these missing papers included
devastating material on the CIA's activities in South East Asia to
include drug running, money laundering and the maintenance of the
notorious 'Regional Interrogation Centers' in Viet Nam and, worse
still, the Zipper files proving the CIA’s active organization of
the assassination of President John Kennedy..
A massive, preemptive disinformation campaign was readied,
using government-friendly bloggers, CIA-paid "historians"
and others, in the event that anything from this file ever surfaced.
The best-laid plans often go astray and in this case, one of the
compliant historians, a former government librarian who fancied
himself a serious writer, began to tell his friends about the CIA
plan to kill Kennedy and eventually, word of this began to leak out
into the outside world.
The originals had vanished and an extensive search was
conducted by the FBI and CIA operatives but without success.
Crowley's survivors, his aged wife and son, were interviewed
extensively by the FBI and instructed to minimize any discussion of
highly damaging CIA files that Crowley had, illegally,
removed from Langley when he retired. Crowley had been a close
friend of James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s notorious head of
Counterintelligence. When Angleton was sacked by
DCI William Colby in December of 1974, Crowley and Angleton
conspired to secretly
remove Angleton’s most sensitive secret files our of the agency.
Crowley did the same thing right
before his own retirement , secretly removing thousands of pages
of classified information that covered his entire agency
career.
Known as “The Crow” within the agency, Robert T. Crowley
joined the CIA at its inception and spent his entire career in the
Directorate of Plans, also know as the “Department of Dirty
Tricks,”: Crowley was one of the tallest man ever to work at the
CIA. Born in 1924 and raised in Chicago, Crowley grew to six and a
half feet when he entered the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in
N.Y. as a cadet in 1943 in the class of 1946. He never graduated,
having enlisted in the Army, serving in the Pacific during World War
II. He retired from the Army Reserve in 1986 as a lieutenant
colonel. According to a book he authored with his friend and
colleague, William Corson, Crowley’s career included service in
military intelligence and Naval Intelligence, before joining the CIA
at inception in 1947. His entire career at the agency was spent
within the Directorate of Plans in covert operations. Before his
retirement, Bob Crowley became assistant deputy director for
operations, the second-in-command in the Clandestine Directorate of
Operations.
One of Crowley’s first major assignments within the agency
was to assist in the recruitment and management of prominent World
War II Nazis, especially those with advanced intelligence
experience. One of the CIA’s major recruitment coups was Heinrich
Mueller, once head of Hitler’s Gestapo who had fled to Switzerland
after the collapse of the Third Reich and worked as an
anti-Communist expert for Masson of Swiss counterintelligence.
Mueller was initially hired by Colonel James Critchfield of the CIA,
who was running the Gehlen Organization out of Pullach in
southern Germany. Crowley eventually came to despise Critchfield but
the colonel was totally unaware of this, to his later dismay.
Crowley’s real expertise within the agency was the Soviet
KGB. One of his main jobs throughout his career was acting as the
agency liaison with corporations like ITT, which the CIA often used
as fronts for moving large amounts of cash off their books. He was
deeply involved in the efforts by the U.S. to overthrow the
democratically elected government of Salvador Allende in Chile,
which eventually got him into legal problems with regard to
investigations of the U.S. government’s grand jury where he has
perjured himself in an agency cover-up
After
his retirement, Crowley began to search for someone who might be
able to write a competent history of his career. His first choice
fell on British author John Costello (author of Ten Days to
Destiny, The Pacific War and other works) but, discovering that
Costello was a very aggressive homosexual, he dropped him and
tentatively turned to Joseph Trento who had assisted Crowley and
William Corson in writing a book on the KGB. When Crowley discovered
that Trento had an ambiguous and probably cooperative relationship
with the CIA, he began to distrust him and continued his search for
an author.
Bob
Crowley first contacted Gregory Douglas
in 1993 when he
found out from John Costello that Douglas was about to publish his
first book on Heinrich Mueller, the former head of the Gestapo who
had become a secret, long-time asset to the CIA. Crowley contacted
Douglas and they began a series of long and often very informative
telephone conversations that lasted for four years. . In 1996,
Crowley , Crowley told Douglas
that he believed him to be the person that should ultimately
tell Crowley’s story but only after Crowley’s death. Douglas,
for his part, became so entranced with some of the material that
Crowley began to share with him that he secretly began to record
their conversations, later transcribing them word for word, planning
to incorporate some, or all, of the material in later publications.
In
1998, when Crowley was slated to go into the hospital for
exploratory surgery, he
had his son, Greg, ship two large foot lockers of documents to
Douglas with the caveat that they were not to be opened until after
Crowley’s death. These documents, totaled
an astonishing 15,000 pages of CIA classified files involving
many covert operations, both foreign and domestic, during the Cold
War.
After
Crowley’s death and Trento’s raid on the Crowley files, huge
gaps were subsequently discovered by horrified CIA officials and
when Crowley’s friends mentioned Gregory Douglas, it was
discovered that Crowley’s son had shipped two large boxes to
Douglas. No one knew their contents but because Douglas was viewed
as an uncontrollable loose cannon who had done considerable damage
to the CIA’s reputation by his on-going publication of the history
of Gestapo-Mueller, they bent every effort both to identify the
missing files and make some effort to retrieve them before Douglas
made any use of them.
All of this furor eventually came to the attention of Dr.
Peter Janney, a Massachusetts clinical psychologist and son of
Wistar Janney, another career senior CIA official, colleague of not
only Bob Crowley but Cord Meyer, Richard Helms, Jim Angleton and
others. Janney was working on a book concerning the murder of Mary
Pinchot Meyer, former wife of Cord Meyer, a high-level CIA official,
and later the mistress of President John F. Kennedy.
Douglas had authored a book, ‘Regicide’ which
dealt with Crowley’s part in the Kennedy assassination and he
obviously had access to at least some of Crowley’s papers. Janney
was very well connected inside the CIA’s higher levels and when he
discovered that Douglas had indeed known, and had often spoken with,
Crowley and that after Crowley’s death, the FBI had descended on
Crowley’s widow and son, warning them to never speak with Douglas
about anything, he contacted Douglas and finally obtained from him a
number of original documents, including the originals of the
transcribed conversations with Robert Crowley.
In spite of the burn bags, the top secret safes and the
vigilance of the CIA to keep its own secrets, the truth has an
embarrassing and often very fatal habit of emerging, albeit decades
later.
While CIA drug running , money-launderings and brutal
assassinations are very often strongly rumored and suspected, it has
so far not been possible to actually pin them down but it is more
than possible that the publication of the transcribed and detailed
Crowley-Douglas conversations will do a great deal towards
accomplishing this.
These
many transcribed conversations are relatively short because Crowley
was a man who tired easily but they make excellent reading. There is
an interesting admixture of shocking revelations on the part of the
retired CIA official and often rampant anti-social (and very
entertaining) activities on the part of Douglas but readers of this
new and on-going series are gently reminded to always look for the
truth in the jest!
Date: Thursday, January 23, 1997
Commenced: 1:45 PM CST
Concluded: 2:12 PM CST
RTC: Good morning, Gregory. What can we
do for you today?
GD: I don’t mean to bother you,
Robert, but I am doing some research on this Kennedy thing and I
have a couple of questions for you.
RTC: I’ll do what I can.
GD: If it’s a problem….
RTC: No, not at all.
GD: You were telling me Oswald was not
involved. Why would anyone want to stick him with the thing?
RTC: He served his purpose. Jim Angleton was determined to blame the
killing on the Russians. He hated them and Jim was a very single
minded man and very determined. I guess later he began to get a
little crazy but at that time, he was very good at his job. Look at
it this way: Oswald was a public Marxist. He was ordered to be a
Marxist by both the ONI and us. He defected to Russia. He married
the niece of a top MVD officer. He came back to the States,
pretending to be pro-Castro. He lived in Dallas when Dallas was
chosen to be the place where Kennedy was nailed out in public. You
see, Jim wanted Russia blamed for the killing. He basically wanted
to have all paths lead to Moscow.
GD: He was inviting a war.
RTC: Of course he was. He wanted a war
with Russia and said so many times to me and the DCI among others.
Now when Oswald came back, he was still connected and got this
classified job with the photography company. We do that for our
people. If we hadn’t smoothed his way, he never would have gotten
the job there. But he never knew a thing about the Kennedy business.
He was a very convenient patsy with a wonderful and provable
background of being a Soviet sympathizer.
GD: I know you were a friend of Angleton
and I’m not questioning his intelligence. Mueller told me about
him. He personally thought he was crazy however.
RTC: At the end, everyone else thought
so. Towards the end, Jim became obsessed with things better left
unsaid. He thought the entire Company was infiltrated by the KGB and
that Colby himself, he was the DCI at that point, was a Soviet
agent. And then there was the Nosenko business. That was this
so-called KRG defector. You see, the Russians got wind of what
Angleton was up to, stirring up a war and all that, and they sent
this Nosenko over to us as a fake defector. His most important
mission was to convince everyone that Oswald had nothing to do with
their agency and they had nothing to do with him. In short, they had
no prior knowledge of the Kennedy business. This terrified Jim who
got his hands on Nosenko and locked him up down on the Farm for two
years. Put him in solitary and kept everyone away from him. Jim was
afraid others would believe Nosenko and then start looking where
they should not. Finally, and it really saddened me, Jim got so
crazy that they forced him out and cut his department back to almost
nothing. Jim had lung cancer…my God, the man smoked like a
chimney…and I remember my last visit with him. He died in ’87.
We met him at the Army/Navy Club for dinner. Very, very sad
occasion. He was a great man, or he had been in his prime, and to
see him slowly dying and forced out by that asshole Colby was
devastating.
GD: What happened to the Ukrainian?
RTC: What Ukrainian?
GD: Nosenko is a Ukrainian name, Robert.
Ends with an O.
RTC: Whatever happened to him? They let
him out, got him a set of new teeth and paid him a stipend for his
troubles.
GD: Was he telling the truth?
RTC: Oh yes, of course. The Russians had nothing to do with the
business. They are far too professional to use someone with such
connections with them. A defector, married to the niece of a top
intelligence officer, spouting Marxist propaganda on the street
corners? No, they would have done what they did when they tried to
kill the Pope in ‘81. Get the Bulgarians to hire a right wing
Turkish terrorist. Plausible deniability.
GD: The favorite words of Ronnie Reagan.
RTC: Exactly so. No, Oswald had much
closer connections with American intelligence that with the Russians
and we both knew it. Jim did not know it, believe me. Once he got
something in his head, he never let go of it. At the end, before
they gave him the sack, he was probably paranoid beyond redemption.
Not stupid but very deluded. He saw moles everywhere. He thought LBJ
was a spy and half of Congress for God’s sake. And his fondness
for college students was getting a little obvious. A genuine
tragedy, Gregory, a fine mind gone to seed.
GD: Male college students. Mueller
caught him in bed with one at the Plaza.
RTC: Leave town and enter a new and
dangerous world.
(Concluded at 2:12 PM CST)
|